Two Tales of One Universe
It was the best of the times, it was the worst of times, it
was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of
belief, it was the epoch of incredibility, it was the season of Light, it ws
the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of
despair.
-
Charles Dickens, A Tale of Two Cities
For cosmologists, this is the best
of times. Since the beginning of the 1990s, progress in the field has been
phenomenal. One successful experiment after another has been performed that has
enhanced our knowledge of the universe, making it possible to test competing
views of its history. As a result, many ideas have fallen by the wayside.
In 1996, at an international
meeting held at Princeton to discuss the long-term future of cosmology, many
different models were still in play. Three years later, only the inflationary
model, with the addition of dark energy, remained viable.
When the WMAP image appeared four
years later, in 2003, cosmologists worldwide breathed a collective sigh of
relief that the new findings were consistent with the sole surviving model.
Astrophysicist John Bahcall, giving the concluding remarks at the WMAP press
conference, accurately expressed the prevailing attitude: “The most revolutionary result obtained [from the WMAP image] is that
there are no revolutionary results. WMAP has confirmed with exquisite precision
the crazy and unlikely scenario that astronomers and physicists cooked up based
upon the incomplete evidence.”
Bahcall described the inflationary
model as “Crazy and un-likely”
because the current version is a patch work quilt sewn together from disparate
ideas added over the previous two decades, plus the assumption of a particular,
odd mixture of ordinary matter, dark matter, and dark energy. “Incredibly, everybody got it essentially right”,
he said, expressing a widely held view that since the inflationary model was
the last surviving model, it must be correct.
At the time of WMAP announcement,
the cyclic model was still new and unfamiliar. Bahcall and other
Astrophysicists were used to comparing models that incorporated small
variations on the basic inflationary model, differing in only one or two
details. But the cyclic model is entirely different. It turns cosmic history
upside down and introduces numerous novel and surprising elements at once. Some
new elements come from fundamental physics, some from general relativity, and
some from cosmology.
As the cyclic model has developed and its
principles have become better known, astrophysicists and physicists have begun
to pay close attention. But in 2003 neither Bahcall nor most other
astrophysicists were aware that the WMAP’s exquisite confirmation of the
inflationary predictions was simultaneously an equally exquisite confirmation
of the cyclic picture.